The following article was printed on MUM Magazine - August 2001,
Vol. 91 No. 3
This
article is printed with permission of David Goodsell, the editor of MUM.
MUM (Magic-Unity-Might) is the official magazine for the Society
of American Magicians
A
Conversation with Norm Nielsen...
the Art of Magic
MUM:
Norm, it is a pleasure to interview you for MUM magazine. Your life has
been well chronicled in other publications; however, I am interested in
going a step beyond what is found in most features. In this interview
I would like to examine your passion for magic, what it is that has made
magic a life long pursuit for you as a performer, a craftsman, and now
as a collector of rare posters. To begin I pose a simple question (well,
maybe not so simple): If we begin with the presumption that for the most
part magic is a craft, what does it take to elevate it to art?
Nielsen:
Most of us became interested in magic by seeing a magician or witnessing
a magic trick, or perhaps by being given a trick deck or magic set. We
might have seen an ad for a magic catalog in Boys' Life or Popular Mechanics.
This fascinated us. We began to visualize ourselves performing magic and
we soon found out that we could amuse someone by doing a trick. Some even
realized they could make people laugh! We all realized that we could entertain
our friends with magic.
We sought
out a magic shop in our town or nearby town. We got books from the library
or a magic video. We saw Doug Henning or David Copperfield on television
and really got fired up. We began to think of what was good or bad magic.

Norm and Lupe Nielsen admire the Talma poser in their collection.
This poster is reproduced in the poster section in this issue.
Eventually,
while some of us pursued magic just as a fascinating hobby, others decided
to take it further. This is where the degree of DESIRE comes into play.
Anybody can accomplish almost anything according to how much desire they
have to attain it. Great desire can overcome any obstacle. We are only
limited by what we believe we can or cannot do. When the desire burns
you up and you have confidence in your abilities, there is not much that
can stop you.
(Left
image: Norm in the Houdini alcove. The poster collection is housed in
a large building adjacent to Norm's and Lupe's home, and each item is
exquisitely mounted and framed.)
When you
add to the formula other factors like good looks, charm, charisma and
intelligence, you have a performer like Channing Pollock, for instance.
But not all of us are blessed with all those qualities; consequently,
we have to work harder to find other ways to overcome those shortcomings
and it is desire that provides us with the energy to do just that.
I remember
when I first saw Neil Foster and later Channing Pollock. They inspired
me so much and the desire grew such that I actually imagined myself working
the same places they had. The burning desire helped me overcome my shortcomings:
I was shy, I had to work very hard to execute the moves, and I wasn't
the tall, dark and handsome guy. It was only desire that pulled me through.
Those of
you that found you could make people laugh and were inspired after seeing
Mac King, Fielding West, Tomsoni, Nick Lewin, Ballantine, George Carl,
etc. began doing the same. That kind of inspiration increases your desire
and pushes you a little beyond.
Those of
you who have a good facility for speaking and the talent for drama probably
were inspired by Doug Henning or David Copperfield or Siegfried and Roy
or Lance Burton. Performing the "Grand Illusions" can be inspiring
on its own.
Another important
element after we get our act together and begin doing shows is to find
out what our stage IMAGE is. What image do we define? If we try to copy
those who inspire us, then we will only be "copy cats." Finding
our image can take time and experience. Drama classes can help and improv
classes can do wonders. Losing your inhibitions on stage will help you
find "who you are" and develop your personality. Then, once
you define your image, aspects like costuming, music and staging etc.
will fall into place.
 
Above left: Norm with
Ed Sullivan. Appearing on the Sullivan Show was a mark of success in that
era.
Above right: The dapper Norm Nielsen poses for the camera.
The question
often asked is: Is magic a craft or an art? According to the American
Heritage Dictionary, "Craft" can be defines as "an occupation
or trade, especially one requiring manual dexterity. It is a skill or
ability in something, especially in handiwork or the arts; proficiency;
expertness." "Art" is defined as "the conscious production
or arrangement of sounds, color, forms, movements or other elements in
a manner that affects the sense of beauty." I think, generally speaking,
magic is a craft. Most of us are craftsmen, and there is nothing wrong
with that. We constantly try to hone our craft to bring it closer to what
we feel is good. There are only a few rare exceptions who have elevated
it to an art, such as Rene Lavand, Richiardi and Cardini. A transcendental
sense of beauty takes over, and you cannot longer define what they do
as something that you just read in a book, bought in a magic shop or even
learned as a craft. Their exquisite timing, movements, expressions bring
us closer to a sense of aesthetic perfection.
MUM: Interesting.
You are saying that success is largely dependent upon desire, the drive
to achieve, to work hard, to perfect. For most that path can lead to recognition
and acclaim as a master craftsman, as a master magician, if you will.
But a master magician is not necessarily an artist. What have you looked
for in your own act, Norm? What were your goals? What sets you apart?
Nielsen:
Unfortunately I don't have a very good answer for you, simply because
I have always done my own thing. Although inspired by others, I never
wanted to copy or be like those who inspired me. When I was inspired by
Channing and Neil Foster, they instilled in me the goal to work the places
they worked. I guess I didn't stop to think that I could not do it, so
I blindly fell forward. At each phase of my career, I passionately loved
what I was doing. I have always felt that I was so fortunate to have found
something (magic) to express myself and to make a good living as well.
One of the
things that brings out the best in any performer is the opportunity to
work with others of greater talent. I have been extremely fortunate to
have worked and become good friends with some of the greatest variety
performers in the business such as Francis Brunn, certainly the world's
greatest juggler during his reign; Sr. Wences, for me the absolute greatest
variety entertainer that I know of; George Carl, the greatest silent comedy
act of his time; the Blackwits, the most remarkable couple performing
in the tradition of the Black Theatre of Prague, etc. It is as if I was
a quarter meter in a race with an Olympic Champion. You know you are not
going to be better than he is, but he is going to draw the best out of
you. I never had any sense of competition or trying to beat anybody because
I always felt outclassed by those around me, which drew the best out of
me.
My
love for music triggered the whole idea for a musical act. The first idea
was to do a playing trumpet in the "zombie" fashion, but I realized
that nobody would see the keys moving, and it would lack animation. So
I realized that a violin with a moving bow would give it the animation
that it needed. Besides, there is the beauty and the mysterious sound
of the violin, which is very magical in itself. The first time I put music
to the violin, I went to a violinist from Turkey who was visiting Kenosha
as part of the Turkish National Symphony. His name was Peti Copez. I asked
him to record some music for me. He replied that he was staying at a friend's
house, and if I would come over that evening and perform the floating
violin for the group of friends he was expecting for dinner, he would
be in the other room where he could see me, and play and record the violin
as I performed. He, by the way, had a beautiful Amari violin, and played
an old Turkish lament of a mother whose son had just died.
(Right image:
Norm performing his signature piece, the Floating Violin.)
MUM: Over
the years you have produced some masterful pieces of equipment. What makes
them special? What was the source of inspiration?
Nielsen:
I learned to build magic from Theo Bamberg. After meeting him in the 1950's
we became close friends, and when I purchased his trunk of tools, he explained
carefully how each tool was used. I wish I had a video of that afternoon.
It was absolutely a priceless experience.
In building
magic, I have been mostly inspired by the beauty of Okito's magic. Okito's
props are in a class by themselves. Every piece is elaborately decorated
and finished with old varnish decals, mostly depicting Oriental motifs.
Probably
Theo's Checker Cabinet was an achievement for me in learning how to build
magic. Here was an Oriental temple, with a pagoda roof and three doors,
along with the mystery of the Checker transposition-vanishing from a canister
and changing places with a glass of rice. The strength of this trick is
in its beauty.
(Left
image: Examining the fine detail of an Okito Checker Cabinet.)
MUM:
Your dove cage is widely respected as certainly one of the finest props
in the business. It may be the most copied design in dove cages. Did you
give any conscious thought to the artistic merit of the design? What were
you trying to accomplish and how do you feel about the final result?
Nielsen:
Of course, your first goal as a magician is to be deceptive; therefore,
we tried to make the table look as small as possible. Incorporating the
wedge principle seemed to be ideal for this. The illusion is to have a
3 inch table appear to be just one inch thick. Adding the silver Mylar
reduces the apparent size and the red line makes it look even thinner.
I think we have achieved exactly what we were trying to achieve: apparently
there is no place for the birds to go, and all that remains is a thin
tabletop.
MUM:
While not in the same category as your table, and certainly a digression
from magic as art, your bottles are "things of beauty" in that
they are so realistic and yet vanish easily.
Nielsen:
Years ago I used the Vanishing Weller Bottle. I always had to put glycerin
on it or wet it to make it look glassy. So I tried putting glossy coats
on latex, and actually found one that worked quite well. But when I found
out the qualities of vinyl, which includes a glossy exterior and still
retains its "memory," I felt I had the ideal material to use
for vanishing bottles. The line includes some rather unique bottles, everything
from Coke, Ketchup, and Champagne bottles to assorted beer bottles.
MUM: At this
point what are your goals as a craftsman?
Nielsen:
Actually, I have never thought about that. You learn whatever you need
to learn to achieve what you need to achieve. If you need to know something
about plastic and have to learn about that, then that is your goal at
the time. If you have to make a canister which has a wood turned top,
you have to get on the lathe and start spinning. The important thing in
building magic is to know the functionality of the prop. You have to understand
what the gimmick has to do.
Theo always
believed that any magician should be a craftsman, and any craftsman of
magic, really needs to understand magic. They work hand in hand.
  
Above right: Norm in one of the alcoves of his
collection.
Above left: A recent publicity photo.
MUM:
Is there something that you would really like to construct?
Nielsen:
I enjoy constructing the Okito items, and I am now in the process of making
Okito's Triangular Mystery. A couple of these will be decorated with decals
made from several of his posters. After this I plan to make a number of
Checker Cabinets.
I guess a
project I would like to achieve is building the ultimate Asrah, which
is only on the drawing board. I hope to add a couple of things to my own
act within the next year, but being a little superstitious, I prefer not
mention what they are.
MUM: What
would be the perfect magic trick?
Nielsen:
I think it depends on the performer, doesn't it? There are a few performers
that can make any trick into the perfect magic trick. The important thing
is that you have to be good at selecting tricks that you can perform well
and fit your personality. Also, you have to work on making it palatable
to the audience. You can see ten people doing the billiard balls, but
only one will be memorable.
MUM:
Is the Checker Cabinet a perfect magic trick?
Nielsen:
Perfection is not in the trick but in the performer. I wonder how many
of us would have any doubt after seeing Okito perform it as to whether
it was perfect or not.
MUM: The
best of the best, again. What is the most exquisite piece of apparatus
you have ever seen?
Nielsen:
The Okito Redman Checker cabinet is, for me the most beautiful piece of
apparatus I have ever seen. Recently one sold for $8000, and had I had
the shekels in my pocket, I would have bought it.
MUM: Let's
discuss the art of the poster. What is your all-time favorite poster and
why?
Nielsen:
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I especially like portraits, partly
because they tell me about the individual magicians. To me, portraits
are more revealing than other posters, as far as at least suggesting to
me something about the performer's personality. One of my favorite posters
is the Kellar 3 sheet full length portrait that appears in the full color
poster collection elsewhere in this issue. It doesn't show any magic,
but apparently, this man, Kellar, was so well known that he did not have
to explain who he was or what he did. He generally used the Strobridge
Litho Company for his posters.
  
The
Thurston Million Dollar Mystery poster by the Otis company (above left)
is certainly a fine poster.
However, when you puti it along side theStrobridge "Levitation"
poster (above right)
you can see the fine craftsmanship of Otis versus the artistry of Strobridge.
MUM:
Was Strobridge a commonly known company?
Nielsen:
Strobridge was certainly one of the finest lithographers of its time.
The most sought after Thurston posters are by Strobridge. Strobridge posters
are the Cadillac of posters.
(Left
image: Norm hangs a favorite Kellar poster.)
MUM:
We have seen the value of magic posters skyrocket in recent years, and
they are popular not only among magician collectors but the general public,
as well. I see them advertised by nationally known auction houses and
on the internet. How does one determine the value of a poster?
Nielsen:
I think the first consideration is the performer. Herrmann posters are
probably among the most sought after, because he was the greatest magician
of his time. It was even said after he died that: "Magic has died."
Of course, Kellar following close behind wouldn't let the American public
believe that, and his posters are probably the second most sought after.
Howard Thurston came next as the successor to Kellar, and his Strobridge
posters, in particular, as very desirable.
The next
consideration in selecting a poster is the particular image. This involves
the artwork, the particular trick that is depicted, etc. The third, and
by no means a minor consideration, is the condition of the poster. Another
major factor is the rarity of a particular poster. How many do we know
of that are still in existence? Is it a unique piece? Are there two or
three or six? I might add at this point that Houdini posters are in a
class by themselves as far as desirability, since there are investment
companies outside of magic that search for them. So if you have a unique
Houdini poster, you have one of the most valuable magic posters in existence.
Regarding
condition again, even where paper is missing it is possible to have it
replaced and have a fine artist restore the missing parts. When this is
done well, you wouldn't even know that the poster had been restored. However,
this is expensive and would only be done on a valuable poster.
(Image
right: Norm with some of the larger posters in his collection.)
MUM:
What makes stone lithographs so special? What are some of the mysteries
in the world of magic posters? Let's dissect a poster. What makes it better
than another?
Nielsen:
Stone lithography was the printing method used during the middle of the
nineteenth century up until the 1930s and even later, in other countries.
Instead of metal plates, as used in more contemporary printing, limestone
was used. For instance, a one sheet poster, which is approximately 30"
x 40," required one 30" x 40" x 3" block of limestone
for each color! If the poster had 4 colors, then four blocks were used,
if it had six colors, six blocks would be used, and so on. Beginning with
the first stone, the artist would draw directly with a greasy ink on a
special kind of water absorbing limestone. The non image areas were treated
with gum arabic and well moistened with water, after which the ink was
applied with a roller. The oily ink adhered only to the greasy image area
and was repelled from the water saturated non image area. The image was
then printed with a special press in which a scraper bar was drawn across
a sheet of paper laid over the inked up stone. Lighter colors were printed
first, followed by the darker ones. The image also had registration marks
so that the colors would layer on top of each other during the printing
process.
MUM: But
why was it so special?
Nielsen:
Stone lithography was very common in the past and wasn't particularly
special. It was the way advertising was printed. In fact, posters only
cost pennies, and most were used as outdoor advertising. The leftovers
were thrown away or used as cheap wrapping paper. In fact, I have some
posters in my collection – which are worth thousands of dollars
today – that were used as wrapping paper in a magic shop. Nowadays,
because the printing methods are so different, stone-lithographs have
become collectibles and a curiosity. There were many techniques that were
employed that cannot be duplicated with the present printing methods.
The richness of the colors and the textures are exquisite and they have
great depth. You can feel that you can almost touch the skin of the performer
on a portrait that is well executed.
To reproduce
a three sheet poster today, with the old methods, it would probably cost
in the vicinity of $150,000. Is that special?
MUM: Earlier
you told us about the Strobridge Litho Company posters. What makes them
more desirable than posters by other companies?
Nielsen:
It is like comparing a Cadillac to a Ford. Nothing wrong with a Ford,
but it does not possess the luxuries of a Cadillac. The Thurston Million
Dollar Mystery poster by the Otis company is certainly a fine poster.
However, when you put it along side the Strobridge "Do the Spirits
Return" poster you can see the fine craftsmanship of Otis versus
the artistry of Strobridge. These posters are reproduced on page twenty
three.
MUM: It comes
down to the skill of the artist, doesn't it. Who were these artists do
we know?
Nielsen:
The artists employed by the lithographers in general were seldom known,
because you would have a different artist for each color: red, blue, yellow
and black. In a few cases posters have been signed by the artist.
MUM: Yes,
but surely one artist did the original rendering. That would make for
some interesting research, wouldn't it? With the increased popularity
of posters there seems to be a kind of aura about them. Are there any
great poster stories?
Nielsen:
One great poster story involves George Johnstone: When he was working
for Harry Blackstone Sr., he was asked to take a stack of posters and
burn them. He asked Pete (Harry's brother) about it, and Pete told him
to take out a few if he liked, and burn the rest. It is very sad to hear
a story like this, as so few of the early Blackstone posters exist.
Another great
poster story is about William Woods. After completing a several month
tour of South America and profiting around $14,000, he proceeded with
his daughter on a barge to the next town they were working. His wife had
traveled ahead by land. The barge sunk and William and his daughter were
both drowned. All of the crew survived, but the $14,000 was never found.
The posters on board the barge survived and that is how we have a number
of stone lithographs of William Woods.
MUM: You
have amassed one of the largest private collections of posters in the
world. Where are the other great collections?
Nielsen:
There are so many collections! David Copperfield's collection is one of
the finest, and so are others that belong to Mike Caveney, George Daily,
Tad Ware, Ken Trombly, Byron Walker, etc. There are also many great European
collections. The Magic Circle has a very impressive poster collection,
for instance.
MUM: Your
collection is fairly recent. How did you go about it? How do you pursue
it today. We are curious about the dealing and trading side of poster
collections. How do you make contacts, for example?
Nielsen:
About ten years ago, a friend of mine gave me two Fu Manchu posters that
were in pieces, out of which I could make one. I framed it and put it
up in my office and the image "grew" on me. I then went to an
IBM Convention, and Mario Carrandi was there with posters. He had one
of Frakson, whom I had known quite well but never knew that he had a poster.
That is also where I saw my first Carter 3 sheet poster: "The Priestess
of Delphi." Mario was interested in getting a "new fish hooked,"
and consequently gave me a deal on both posters. And hooked I was!
The fact
that we have a website allows people to know about us and to contact us.
Sometimes we place ads in magazines or newspapers searching for magic
posters, and sometimes we contact people whom we think might have them.
Most times, people contact us. Your readers might enjoy seeing our website.
It is: http://www.nnmagic.com
Trading posters
is sometimes very difficult since each party feels that the poster or
posters that they are trading are more valuable than what the other party
is trading. It is extremely satisfying when there is a successful trade
where the parties don't try to place an exact value on each poster, and
they both end with the poster they want.
MUM:
Many of us were thrilled when Charlie and Regina Reynolds published their
poster book back in the 1970's. Those books were often taken apart and
placed on the walls of "magic rooms." Lee Jacobs has also provided
a great service with his inexpensive poster reproductions. However, you
have taken this up several notches. Tell us about your poster reproductions.
Nielsen:
I find it most satisfying to scan and duplicate some of the finer posters,
so that others might share in the enjoyment of the images. This, I believe,
does not reduce the value of the original. In fact, I think it creates
more demand for posters that people were not even aware of. The original
posters are probably worth thousands of dollars. I think these reproductions
will create even more of a demand for the original, at least for those
who can afford them.
MUM: But
what makes them different, Norm. While they are but a fraction of the
cost of an original, they still cost several hundred dollars.
Nielsen:
To make a reproduction, the original is scanned on a 1:1 basis, so that
there is no loss of detail from the original. That computer file can be
enhanced, the colors tweaked, and then printed on fine canvas. In some
cases, the reproduction will look just as good when placed beside the
original. The finer the lithograph, the better quality the reproduction
will be. In the past year we invested $40,000 in equipment in order to
achieve the finest results. We can scan an image up to 50 inches wide
by whatever length, and print it just as wide.
We do have
people who have good collections of original posters purchase our reproductions.
This is because they love a particular image and, even if they could find
the original, they couldn't afford it. We have a passion for the images
and we want to share those images with other people. Certainly if someone
has a unique poster that people haven't even seen, then there is more
demand for the reproductions; this also creates more of a demand for the
original. It advertises the original.
MUM: Are
there any posters that you desperately want?
 Nielsen:
The posters I look for now, without too much hope of finding them, are
the Herrmanns, Kellars and the early Thurston Strobridge. I am also in
search of unusual Chung Ling Soo posters as well as Okito pieces.
MUM: As I
entered your living room I was struck by your wonderful collection of
Soo posters. Certainly many of these would be considered in the top ten
most artistic posters of all time. How many different Soo posters are
in your collection and which are your favorites?
Nielsen:
We currently have 57 Chung Ling Soo posters. My favorites are: The Soo
3 sheet "Ribbons" (which may be a unique piece), the Golden
Horse Dragon, and the Mosaic Portraits.
MUM: Considering
your entire collection, what is your absolute favorite poster, the best
of the best?
Nielsen:
In coIlectors' meetings there is always the question: "If there was
a fire and you had the chance to save one piece, what would it be?"
I would probably die of a heart attack on the spot, because I couldn't
make that decision. I always speak of a poster as one of my favorite ones;
it would be difficult, if not impossible, to say that I love one poster
more than all the rest. I am looking for the next poster I haven't seen
yet in the hopes that it will become my favorite.
MUM: Let's
turn back to your life as an international performer. When I think of
our generation (you and I are about the same age, Norm) I think of you,
Kodell, Marvyn Roy. Great similarities. Elegance and sophistication. Is
this the European influence?
Nielsen:
When I went to Europe to perform, I was used to the generosity of American
audiences who are so receptive and applaud easily. French audiences were
different. When I first worked the Crazy Horse Saloon in Paris, I allowed
the audience to intimidate me. Then I realized that I had to walk on stage
as if I owned the stage, and that these people were coming into my home
to see me. This was a great learning step in my career.
Marvyn Roy,
Jack Kodell and I came from more or less the same time period, when we
believed we should dress as well as the best dressed person in the audience.
Since our acts were silent, we could work in any country in the world
and by dressing in tails or tuxedo, we found we were well accepted anywhere.
However, when Doug Henning came along as the flower child in overalls,
he endeared himself to the American public like no other magician before
him. Later David Copperfield vanished the Statue of Liberty in casual
dress. This established a new mode of dressing that has been copied ever
since. Also, society has changed considerably, and things have become
much more casual.
MUM: But
you still perform in formal attire?
Nielsen:
This is because I feel comfortable in it. A leopard doesn't change its
spots.
MUM: You
recently were the featured act in the opening of a new cabaret in Mexico
City. How was that?
Nielsen:
The cabaret in Mexico was a heart warming experience. The audiences loved
magic as if they had not seen it before. I did my regular act for them
with the cards, coins, flute and violin. It was exciting for me to work
on a daily basis.
MUM:
Do you work close-up, Norm?
Nielsen:
No, I do not do close-up magic. When Lupe and I are booked in conventions
together, I do the stage magic and she does the close-up. I think we both
would like to do something together in the future.
MUM: How
have your performance goals changed over the years?
Nielsen:
I don't know that they have. I am still looking toward doing something
new and fresh. Because of the poster and magic business, it has become
more difficult now to work steadily as I did before. But I am still working
on new things that I hope to introduce soon.
MUM: We can't
conclude this interview without asking you to share the Lupe and Norm
story. As a romantic at heart, I find that somewhat magical in itself.
Maybe Lupe would like to respond to this one.
Lupe:
I was born in Panama and became interested in magic at age 6. In fact,
the first book I read was a children's magic book I checked out of the
library at that time.
As a teenager,
I went to my regular school during the morning, went to the National School
of Theatre in the afternoons, and performed magic during the weekends.
I mostly performed children's magic, did some walk around, and even did
some illusions by convincing some of my theatre buddies to help me out.
Those were fun days.
I then quit
magic and came to the U.S. to get a B.A. degree in Theatre. After that,
I became more interested in close up magic and have been working on and
off in this field since then. I have also been very fortunate to meet
very talented magicians who have been my mentors and friends. I am very
grateful to them, as they all have helped me to improve my magic: Ray
Goulett, Scotty York, Mike Skinner, Mike Close, and Norm Nielsen, among
others.
I met Norm
during a Hank Lee Convention in 1989, and spoke a few times on the phone
afterwards. After exploring the East Coast of the United States, I decided
to go west, and chose Las Vegas as my new home. After admiring one of
Nick Ruggiero's Blackstone posters (I used to work for Nick at Collector's
Workshop), Nick told me about a few poster collectors, including Norm.
When I arrived in Las Vegas, I was just another visitor who came to see
Norm and his collection. We went out a few times, and then he asked me
if I would be interested in working at Nielsen Magic, as Connie Boyd,
who was working for him at the time, would soon be leaving town to become
a successful cruise ship magicians. I started working for Norm part time.
Eventually, the part time job became a full time job, and we discovered
that we had a lot in common. We decided to marry in May of 1998.
At this time
I dedicate most of my time to Nielsen Magic, and perform only occasionally.
It is great when we go to magic conventions and Norm gets booked for the
stage, I get booked for close-up, and we even have a booth in the dealers'
room!
MUM:
Norm, you and I have been around long enough to have witnessed the dramatic
rise in magic as a performing art and favorite form of entertainment.
We know that it was like that once before, in the so called "Golden
Era" of magic, with the touring stage shows of Thurston, Blackstone
and Dante, and magicians at many of the top nightclubs around the country.
When we became interested in magic it was on the wane, and then it came
back stronger than ever. What does the future hold?
Nielsen:
I think the over saturation of magic specials in the United States has
decreased the interest in magic today, and the exposure of magic on television
has lessened the mystery. There is no secrecy in magic anymore. I first
was introduced to magic by a barber, when I was 11 years old, and he would
not show me how any tricks were done. Instead, he wanted me to watch him
perform. He knew that if I had the desire, I would learn how he was doing
them. That is how I began to learn magic. This instilled in me how important
it was to keep secrets of magic secret.
How many
times have you seen a secret revealed to a layman who then says: "Aaah,
is that all?" And then he loses the interest he expressed in the
first place. Magic information is now so easily available, in videos,
books, the internet, etc., that magic is taken for granted. Younger people
don't have to earn the knowledge anymore. Also, there doesn't seem to
be any interest in the history of magic. You go to a collector's convention
and it is the same group of old guys. Maybe that interest comes later
in life.
I think we
are in a decline in the popularity of magic. And I think it will be at
least a 20 year cycle before it turns again, just as it has in the past.
But regardless of this, magic will survive. Whenever good magic is performed,
people love it. Wherever you go in the world, it is the same.
|